Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

3 Pages<123
Too posh to push?
4Tots Offline
#41 Posted : Friday, 15 January 2010 6:04:08 AM(UTC)

Rank: Lady of the Lake

Posts: 2,092

I also think sometimes, that some Dr's encourage their private patients to opt for a c-s. Means the Dr has them pencilled in for the surgery and can go out and play 9-holes of golf before everyone is due in theatre! It's for their convenience. I know of a few Dr's who do this and it's just not right.


Little sister to 5 big brothers (15, 11, 5, 3, 3) and 1 big sister (18 months)

7 Little Australian's
motherofmany Offline
#42 Posted : Friday, 15 January 2010 6:15:10 AM(UTC)


Rank: Queen of the Quackery

Posts: 2,716
Location: Perth

i had 5 superb straightforward quick and easy vaginal births before i became pregnant with the twins. i had every intention of delivering them the same way even though my obstetrician was an advocate for all multiple births being c/section (this, even though he had seen me deliver all of the others).

i have never been a fan of c/s, infact, i would say it was always my worst fear of giving birth, that it would end up as surgical.

cut a long story short, the twins were not in the right positions for a vaginal delivery so i had a c/section. it went fine and i had no complications, and my recovery was really fast like others have also experienced. have to say it felt like i went into a shop and picked my babies from a shelf though :roll: it was just a different experience emotionally, quite detatched, and i think i have earned the right to say that :lol: :lol:

personally, it would never be my preferred option, but as my ob said "you will get over the disappointment a lot quicker than you would the loss of a child" humbling comment :oops:


Utetraveller Offline
#43 Posted : Friday, 15 January 2010 6:20:55 AM(UTC)

Rank: Queen of the Quackery

Posts: 2,751
Location: The Crazy House - SE Melbourne

I had an emergency C/S due to pre-eclampsia and being in Hospital for 2 weeks before having DS, they tried inducing me but nothing happened (partly due to me being bedridden for the entire time). Anyway I'd also been blacking in and out and was getting the same feeling I get before a seizure so I was TOLD I was having a C/S.

It was HORRIBLE! I only remember the first five minutes of DS's life and then nothing until the next day (born at 12midday). DH and the MWs took lots of photos so I can look at them atleast, but I was also bed ridden for the first three days of his life so DH got to do all the "firsts", which helped with their bonding but did nothing for mine. I was able to BF him straight away, even in recovery.

I lost 2.5lt blood and had a seizure too and felt like CR*P for a long time. I feel ripped off that I didn't get to feel that "euphoric" feeling that people talk about when having a VB birth. DH and I are discussing having a VBAC for #2 but my GP and OB have strongly advised against it. In fact the only positive things I have heard about VBACs are from this forum.
BekL&E Offline
#44 Posted : Friday, 15 January 2010 6:35:18 AM(UTC)

Rank: Moderator

Posts: 18,447
Location: Central QLD

"motherofmany" wrote:

as my ob said "you will get over the disappointment a lot quicker than you would the loss of a child" humbling comment :oops:


This is a very good quote and I am glad you posted it.

My C/S baby was born critically unwell which was not diagnosed in utero... we assumed he'd be perfectly healthy. Sometimes I wonder if the reason I was unwell during pregnancy was the universe saying ''this baby needs to be born via C/S and if the stupid sonographer can see several major defects during 4 scans then we will have to go via you!!!!!''

I am disapointed that I had a C/S but I would be more so if we'd lost him. Thanks again for posting. 8) 8) 8)
Bek: 33
DH: (Rob) 32
Luca Adam: Natural birth in Jan 2006, 3.6kg & BF for 22 months!!
Elliot Robert: Emerg C/S in Dec 2008, 2.8kg & BF for 29 months!!
‎Isaac Benjamin: Emerg C/S in Dec 2011, 1.9kg (32+2) & BF for 5 mths + with early help from Mothers Milk Bank!!

gemgem Offline
#45 Posted : Friday, 15 January 2010 6:44:14 AM(UTC)

Rank: Duckling

Posts: 507
Location: Adelaide

Who really cares?? - if people are happy to make a decision to birth in that way then good for them!! It's not affecting anyone else and I never hear in the news about babies dying because they have been born by c-section....




Me: 30
DH: 30
DD1: 25/01/2008
DD2: 4/3/2010

m/c May 2009
BekL&E Offline
#46 Posted : Friday, 15 January 2010 6:49:46 AM(UTC)

Rank: Moderator

Posts: 18,447
Location: Central QLD

"gemgem" wrote:
Who really cares?? - if people are happy to make a decision to birth in that way then good for them!! It's not affecting anyone else and I never hear in the news about babies dying because they have been born by c-section....


I guess some people care because you could argue it's an expense billed to the public health system. I am not one of those people... I don't really care what other people do either.

But I think for the individual mum in question... she may care. If an ob is encouraging or forceful of a C/S, the feelings associated with having a non ideal birth can last a long time. It's usually after the huge drama of birth that you sit down and think about these things and realise that you did in fact have choices that were never put forward. The argument is the rising C/S rate and why... and I think some of that may have a lot to do with the health professionals and their own agenda.
Bek: 33
DH: (Rob) 32
Luca Adam: Natural birth in Jan 2006, 3.6kg & BF for 22 months!!
Elliot Robert: Emerg C/S in Dec 2008, 2.8kg & BF for 29 months!!
‎Isaac Benjamin: Emerg C/S in Dec 2011, 1.9kg (32+2) & BF for 5 mths + with early help from Mothers Milk Bank!!

Tinkesbelle Offline
#47 Posted : Friday, 15 January 2010 6:56:18 AM(UTC)

Rank: Queen of the Quackery

Posts: 2,963

I have had two the first was an emergency after 13 hours of intense labour and having a failed venthouse and forceps. I had a topped up epidural and was awake for the entire thing and DH was with me the whole time. But I didn't hold my baby until he was about 6hours old due to the pain killers and been exhausted and generally out of it. Recovery was slowish and I swelled like a balloon.

The second was classes as a medically nessecary elective as the doctor who did the first one also did a D&C on me a year later and she said due to the way my body was I had a 90% chance of having to have an emergency one again if I tried a VBAC. The spinal failed so it was a general which freaked me out and I was all alone. It worried me and at times still does that we might of got the wrong baby. Recovery has been hard and has taken a long time. I was not allowed to give the baby a bottle until the next morning and I was able to get myself out of bed and showered - hospital policy. The general took a few days to wear off.

I went through the public system who don't like to do c-sections at the best of times so I know mine were both needed and not wanted.

DH's family all made rude comments about me been too posh and too much of a princess to push even after the emergency and having been explained the medical reasons for it. No one else made any comments about them

I have not had a VBAC but from what I hear and have seen the recovery in most people is much quicker, far less painful and far less invasive than c-sections.

Anyone who thinks it is the easy way out needs to have major abdominal surgery, that might make them realise it is no walk in the park.
RenZ Offline
#48 Posted : Friday, 15 January 2010 6:59:16 AM(UTC)


Rank: Queen of the Quackery

Posts: 6,413
Location: Dural NSW

The way I see it is alot like gemgem

"gemgem" wrote:
Who really cares?? - if people are happy to make a decision to birth in that way then good for them!! It's not affecting anyone else and I never hear in the news about babies dying because they have been born by c-section....


As long as the baby is out and safe thats all the really matters to me... And yes some ppl in the public health system choose to and yes it is bulk billed but I would put money on it alot of those ppl have paid a heap of taxes too so they should be entitled to choose how they want to birth their baby






DSD1 - 17 ~ DSD2 - 16

*~*~*~* Giving birth is like grabbing your lower lip and forcing it over your head *~*~*~*
MrsB Offline
#49 Posted : Friday, 15 January 2010 7:14:54 AM(UTC)


Rank: Queen of the Quackery

Posts: 6,081
Location: In a galaxy far far away ...

I've had three varieties of c/s.

My first was an emergency after failing to progress. What sweet releif! I was induced 5 days previously. Nothing happened until day 5. 6 hours of labour with cyntocin still didn't get us there. And he was becoming distressed. Evidentally, his head was not engaged. My pelvis was too small for a normal sized newborns head to pass, by something like 2cm diametre. (And my kids all have big heads anyway) My Dr refused to let me try a VBAC with #2 for this reason. We are in rural NSW, so our hospital would not cope with the potential complications. If I went private, I may have been able to go to a bigger regional hospital.
So for DS2 we had an 'elective' c/s. I got over the whole 'dissapointment' of not labouring naturally when my mother pointed out to me how many babies my age died from complicated labours in the '70's. I was happy to have a healthy baby. My spinal block didn't work, so this one was a general. It was a bit dissapointing, but it just made DS3 even sweeter, because I WENT INTO LABOUR MYSELF WITH HIM!! * gloat gloat*
With DS3 I had a spinal block at about 3 in the morning after going into labour. We were rediculously thrilled! We had photos in theater and everything. For us it was just perfect!!!! :D And the clostest thing to a 'natural' delivery that I will get to have.
I'm 38 and have never successfully delivered naturally, so it's just never going to happen.
There are worse things happening in the world to get my knickers in a knot about. I have 3 healthy children. I'm luckier than so many other people. :)



~hannah~ Offline
#50 Posted : Friday, 15 January 2010 7:15:54 AM(UTC)

Rank: Queen of the Quackery

Posts: 4,612

The thought of a c-section scares me :shock: I wouldnt elect for one but if I needed one in emergency I would.


JodieRachelle Offline
#51 Posted : Friday, 15 January 2010 7:24:10 AM(UTC)


Rank: Queen of the Quackery

Posts: 6,351
Location: Gosford, NSW

"~hannah~" wrote:
The thought of a c-section scares me :shock: I wouldnt elect for one but if I needed one in emergency I would.


Me too.. After my first one that went wrong my biggest fear is a c-section..if we have another baby and I need a c section for any reason I refuse to be awake.


Jack 21.01.08
Me- 24 DH-28
Rachel1985 Offline
#52 Posted : Friday, 15 January 2010 7:36:53 AM(UTC)


Rank: Queen of the Quackery

Posts: 6,339
Location: Romsey, VIC

"~hannah~" wrote:
The thought of a c-section scares me :shock: I wouldnt elect for one but if I needed one in emergency I would.


Me too... DF knows this, it has been drilled into his head the last 30 weeks!! ONLY if it absolutely necessary.

I agree with gemgem though... As long as bub is out, and both mum and bub are healthy and happy... Who really cares? :wink:
Me (Rachel): 25
DF (Nathan): 23
DS (Joshua): 14/02/2008

DD (Abbie): 29/03/2010



Users browsing this topic
Anonymous (Hidden)
3 Pages<123
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2010, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 1.927 seconds.